An Australian Innovation on the World Stage: PAS Scientific Named Finalist for the Chemical Safety Response Award

We’re proud to share some exciting news from one of our manufacturers. PAS Scientific, the Australian developer of the ASBpro Handheld Asbestos Analyser, has been shortlisted as one of five finalists for the Chemical Safety Response Award at Chemical Risk Expo in Houston, Texas.

After reviewing this year’s exhibitors, the judging team identified the ASBpro as one of the standout innovations on display. PAS Scientific is the only Australian finalist, earning its place alongside international companies at a major US event focused on chemical and industrial risk.

As the ASBpro’s distributor here in Australia, we’re delighted to see technology developed close to home recognised on an international stage. Here’s a closer look at the event, the nomination and the analyser behind it.

About Chemical Risk Expo

Chemical Risk Expo takes place on 14 and 15 October 2026 at the George R. Brown Convention Center in Houston. The event focuses on disaster-linked chemical incidents across the full lifecycle, from prevention and preparedness through to response and recovery.

Houston is a major hub for high-consequence industrial operations, and the expo brings together:

Operators working across chemical plants, refineries, terminals, tank farms and pipelines
Emergency responders and hazmat logistics specialists
Process safety leaders, EHS directors and risk managers
Environmental remediation experts and public-sector stakeholders

The expo runs alongside Disasters Expo USA and several other co-located events dedicated to disaster preparedness, response and recovery.

The Chemical Safety Response Award is judged from among the event’s exhibitors. For an asbestos analyser, recognition at a chemical and hazardous materials event reflects how closely rapid, on-site screening aligns with safer and faster decision-making around hazardous materials.

What the Nomination Involves

As one of five finalists, PAS Scientific will:

Present to the judging panel on the first day of the event, Wednesday 14 October
Deliver a short presentation of three to five minutes, scheduled between 1pm and 2pm
Be considered alongside four other shortlisted finalists for this year’s award

The Innovation Behind the Nomination: ASBpro

The ASBpro is a handheld asbestos analyser developed in Australia by PAS Scientific. It uses near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy to screen suspect materials directly on site, rather than relying solely on laboratory turnaround times.

NIR identifies materials by how they interact with light, producing a spectral signature that can be compared against known references. In the ASBpro, that approach is paired with:

Rapid, non-destructive scans: results in under 10 seconds, with no cutting, drilling or sampling required
Clear results: coverage of all six regulated asbestos types, with PASS/FAIL outcomes and ASBpro ID to identify the specific type detected
Lightweight design: 150g and small enough to fit in the palm of the hand
Evidence-backed records: onboard photo tagging and full reports generated directly from the controller
A strong reference base: backed by one of the largest real-sample asbestos libraries available

Rapid screening doesn’t replace laboratory analysis. As we explored in our article on why asbestos is still being missed even when testing exists, it adds an earlier layer of detection, with flagged materials still able to go on for confirmatory lab testing.

That earlier layer matters more as Australia tightens its asbestos testing rules. The ASBpro supports asbestos detection across a range of sectors:

Rapid response: on-the-spot screening of illegally dumped material
Building inspections and demolition: identifying asbestos materials before lab testing or site disturbance
Waste management and recycling: screening incoming loads to reduce contamination risk at the source
Customs and border control: real-time inspections of imported goods to support compliance
Automotive and shipping: checking brakes, clutches and gaskets before parts move further through the supply chain
Emergency response: large-scale screening after bushfires, floods or structural damage

How ASBpro Works

The ASBpro turns asbestos screening into a five-step, on-site workflow:

Identify: assess the suspect material, surface or component on site
Scan: point the handheld unit at the material for a direct, non-destructive NIR scan
View results: see a PASS/FAIL result on the controller straight away, with the asbestos type identified when detected
Capture evidence: take a geotagged photo linked directly to the scan result
Report: generate a complete report and share it digitally when network access is available

This workflow also underpins integrations such as ASBpro and Alpha Tracker, which connect on-site screening results with digital reporting and project records.

Looking Ahead

Being named a finalist is a milestone for PAS Scientific and a proud moment for us as a distributor. It also recognises what the ASBpro was built to do: give people making decisions in the field faster, clearer answers.

PAS Scientific will present to the judges on 14 October, and we’ll share the outcome once the winner is announced. Whatever the result, an Australian innovation earning a place on a US stage is well worth celebrating.

To learn more about the ASBpro or how it could support your approach to asbestos screening, get in touch with the PAS team

Resources

How does surface contamination affect NIR readings?

Why Surface Condition Matters in NIR Testing

NIR measurements depend on how near-infrared light interacts with the sample surface or near-surface region. If contamination is present, the analyser may measure the contaminant as well as, or instead of, the target material.

Organic residues, oils, moisture, powders, cleaning agents, and process films can create their own absorption features. These may interfere with identification, classification, or quantitative models. Even thin layers can matter if the target measurement is surface-sensitive or if the contaminant has strong NIR absorption bands.

The effect depends on the contaminant type, thickness, coverage, and the application. For reliable NIR results, the sample should be presented consistently and should represent the material used to build the calibration model. Cleaning, mixing, subsampling, repeated scans, or rejecting visibly contaminated material may be appropriate depending on the test method.

Improving Confidence in NIR Readings

For more detail on the method, review PAS’s overview of Near Infrared Spectroscopy technology. To compare suitable instruments, explore PAS’s NIR analysers through Portable Analytical Solutions, or contact our team to discuss sample presentation, contamination risks, and measurement requirements.

Why NIR cannot analyse pure metals or alloys?

Why Metals Are Poor Candidates for NIR Analysis

NIR analysis is based on interactions between near-infrared light and molecular vibrations. It is most useful where the sample contains bonds such as C-H, O-H, N-H, or S-H that produce measurable absorption patterns.

Pure metals and many alloys are not molecular materials in the same way as polymers, foods, minerals with water content, or organic compounds. They are also often reflective, opaque, and optically unsuitable for generating useful NIR spectra. As a result, NIR cannot normally identify alloy grade or measure metal composition directly.

There may be cases where NIR can assess a coating, residue, organic layer, lubricant, or corrosion-related material on a metal surface, but this is not the same as analysing the metal or alloy itself. For direct alloy identification or elemental composition, XRF is usually the more appropriate technique.

Assessing NIR Suitability for Metallic Samples

For more detail on the method, review PAS’s overview of Near Infrared Spectroscopy technology. To compare available systems, explore PAS’s NIR analysers through Portable Analytical Solutions, or get in touch to discuss whether your material is suitable for NIR measurement.

Why NIR cannot detect elements like XRF?

Why NIR and XRF Measure Different Information

Near-infrared spectroscopy works by measuring how a material absorbs, reflects, or transmits near-infrared light. The spectral response comes from molecular vibrations, especially bonds involving hydrogen. This makes NIR useful for many organic materials, moisture-related measurements, polymers, food products, agricultural materials, pharmaceuticals, and some minerals.

XRF works differently. It excites atoms in the sample and measures the characteristic X-rays emitted by each element. This allows XRF to identify and quantify many elements directly, including metals and other inorganic elements.

Because NIR does not measure atomic emissions, it cannot report elemental concentrations in the same way as XRF. NIR may detect properties that correlate with composition when a validated calibration model exists, but it should not be treated as a direct elemental analysis technique.

Choosing the Right Method for Composition Testing

For more detail on the method, review PAS’s overview of Near Infrared Spectroscopy technology. To compare suitable systems, explore PAS’s NIR analysers through Portable Analytical Solutions, or contact our team to discuss whether NIR is suitable for your material and measurement objective.

Can XRF detect heavy metals in soil?

What Affects Heavy Metal Detection in Soil

XRF identifies elements by measuring characteristic fluorescent X-rays from the soil sample. This makes it useful for rapid screening of contaminated land, mine-affected soils, industrial sites, waste areas, and other locations where metal concentrations need to be assessed quickly.

Detection performance depends on the element, concentration level, soil matrix, moisture content, particle size, sample thickness, and measurement time. Some elements are easier to detect than others, and low concentrations may require longer test times, better preparation, or laboratory confirmation.

Soil preparation can make a significant difference. Drying, sieving, grinding, mixing, and using consistent sample cups can improve repeatability and reduce variation caused by uneven particles or moisture. For regulatory decisions, XRF results should be validated against the required method or supported with laboratory analysis.

Assessing XRF for Heavy Metal Soil Testing

For more detail on how the method works, review PAS’s overview of X-Ray Fluorescence technology. To compare suitable field instruments, explore PAS’s handheld XRF analysers through Portable Analytical Solutions, or contact our team to discuss soil type, target metals, and detection requirements.

How is XRF used in environmental soil testing?

Practical Use of XRF for Soil Screening

Handheld XRF can be used on soil in the field, in sample bags, or on prepared samples, depending on the method and required confidence level. It is commonly used to identify areas of elevated metal concentration, compare sampling locations, and prioritise samples for laboratory confirmation.

Soil testing by XRF is affected by moisture, particle size, organic matter, sample thickness, surface condition, and matrix effects. Wet or poorly mixed soil can reduce repeatability, while coarse particles or uneven contamination can make a small measurement area less representative of the bulk sample.

For higher confidence, soils are often dried, sieved, mixed, and measured in a consistent sample cup or test setup. XRF is well suited to rapid screening and field decision support, but laboratory analysis may still be required for regulatory reporting, method validation, or final compliance decisions.

Reviewing XRF for Soil Assessment

For more detail on the technique, review PAS’s overview of X-Ray Fluorescence technology. To assess portable options for field testing, explore PAS’s handheld XRF analysers through Portable Analytical Solutions, or get in touch to discuss soil samples, target elements, and testing requirements.

How is XRF used in geochemistry?

How XRF Supports Geochemical Analysis

XRF works by exciting atoms in a sample and measuring the fluorescent X-rays they emit. Each element produces characteristic X-ray energies, allowing the analyser to identify which elements are present and estimate their concentrations.

In geochemistry, this is useful for understanding rock composition, alteration patterns, mineralisation, contamination, and elemental trends across a site. Handheld XRF can be used in the field on rock chips, drill core, soils, sediments, and prepared samples, giving geologists rapid information before laboratory results are available.

Results depend on the sample type and preparation. Moisture, particle size, surface condition, matrix effects, and calibration can all influence accuracy. For stronger confidence, XRF data should be collected using a consistent method and supported by laboratory analysis where precise reporting or compliance is required.

Considering XRF for Geochemical Work

For more detail on the measurement method, review PAS’s overview of X-Ray Fluorescence technology. To compare field-ready instruments, explore PAS’s handheld XRF analysers through Portable Analytical Solutions, or contact our team to discuss geochemical samples, target elements, and field workflows.

How important is homogenisation for NIR accuracy?

Why Sample Uniformity Affects NIR Results

NIR analysis depends on consistent interaction between light and the sample. In powders, grains, minerals, food ingredients, polymers, and blended materials, differences in particle distribution or composition can cause one reading to vary from another.

Poor homogenisation can lead to unstable spectra, weak repeatability, and inaccurate predictions. This is especially important when the property being measured is not evenly distributed through the sample, such as moisture, active ingredient content, contamination, or blend uniformity.

Homogenisation does not always mean intensive grinding or processing. The right approach depends on the sample and application. Mixing, controlled presentation, repeated scans, cup rotation, or representative subsampling may be enough to improve confidence. For quantitative NIR work, the calibration should reflect the same preparation and presentation used in routine testing.

Improving NIR Measurement Reliability

For more detail on the method, review PAS’s overview of Near Infrared Spectroscopy technology. To compare suitable instruments, explore PAS’s NIR analysers through Portable Analytical Solutions, or contact our team to discuss homogenisation, sample preparation, and accuracy requirements.

What is the role of chemometric calibration in NIR?

How Chemometrics Turns NIR Spectra into Results

NIR spectra contain broad, overlapping absorption features rather than simple isolated peaks. Chemometric calibration is used to interpret this complex spectral information and link it to the property being measured.

A calibration model is built using representative samples that have been analysed by a reliable reference method. The NIR spectra and reference results are then used to create a model that can predict results for similar unknown samples.

The quality of the calibration controls the reliability of the NIR result. A good model should include the expected range of sample variation, including composition, moisture, particle size, temperature, and presentation conditions. Models also need validation to confirm they perform reliably on real samples, not only on the calibration set.

Building Confidence in NIR Calibration

For more detail on the measurement principle, review PAS’s overview of Near Infrared Spectroscopy technology. To compare suitable systems, explore PAS’s NIR analysers through Portable Analytical Solutions, or get in touch to discuss calibration models, reference data, and application requirements.

Why do NIR models drift over time?

Why NIR Calibration Models Need Ongoing Checks

Near-infrared spectroscopy relies on calibration models that connect spectral patterns to known sample properties. If the materials being tested change outside the original calibration range, the model may become less reliable.

Model drift can be caused by new raw material sources, seasonal variation, particle size changes, moisture differences, temperature shifts, instrument ageing, lamp changes, or changes in sample presentation. Even small changes can affect spectra if they were not represented in the original calibration set.

Drift does not always mean the instrument has failed. It often means the model needs validation, adjustment, or expansion with new representative samples. Routine checks against reference methods help confirm whether the model is still suitable for the application.

Maintaining Reliable NIR Performance

For more detail on the method, review PAS’s overview of Near Infrared Spectroscopy technology. To compare suitable instruments, explore PAS’s NIR analysers through Portable Analytical Solutions, or contact our team to discuss model validation, calibration updates, and routine measurement requirements.